Reconsidering the Manifesto for Social Sciences: Political Challenges, Digital Risks, and New Political Agendas

Main Article Content

Michel Wieviorka
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-4053

Abstract

This article presents a critical reflection on the reconfiguration of the social sciences within contemporary digital transformations, connecting classical debates on modernity, power, and knowledge with current approaches such as information studies, the critical sociology of digital capitalism, and post-truth theory. Drawing on the Touraine tradition and Castells’s analysis of the network society, it argues that digital mutation concentrates economic, epistemic, and symbolic capital in major corporations, displacing social inquiry and undermining academic freedom. Mobilizing perspectives from Hardt and Negri, Morozov, Illouz, and Zuboff, the text examines how algorithms generate new forms of domination, inequality, and manipulation, placing democracy in a condition of structural fragility. In the face of illiberal drift, public fragmentation, and expanding datafication, the author advocates for a renewed critical agenda integrating humanism, democratic regulation, and epistemologies capable of confronting the civilizational risks embedded in the digital ecosystem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wieviorka, M. (2026). Reconsidering the Manifesto for Social Sciences: Political Challenges, Digital Risks, and New Political Agendas. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales, 71(256). https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2026.256.94560

Citas en Dimensions Service

References

Anderson, Chris (2008) “El fin de la teoría: El diluvio de datos vuelve obsoleto el método científico” Wired [en línea]. 23 de junio. Disponible en: <https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/>

Arcep (2023) Environment [en línea]. Disponible en: < https://en.arcep.fr/news/press-releases/view/n/environment-060323.html#:~:text=In%20August%202020%2C%20the%20ministers,reach%2054%20TWh%20a%20year).>

Beck, Ulrich (2016) The Metamorphosis of the World. Polity Press.

Berrebi-Hoffmann, Isabelle y Quentin Chapus (2022) “Protest movements by gafam employees in the United States (2015-2021)” Réseaux (231).

Boullier, Dominique (2020) Comment sortir de l’emprise des réseaux sociaux. Le Passeur,

Boullier, Dominique (2025) “Sommet IA : la nécessaire sécession sémantique européenne” aoc [en línea]. 10 de febrero. Disponible en: <https://aoc.media/analyse/2025/02/09/sommet-ia-la-necessaire-secession-semantique-europeenne/>

Calmann-Lévy (1994) Liberté de l'esprit. 2da ed.

Casilli, Antonio A. (2019) En attendant les robots. Enquête sur le travail du clic. Éd. du Seuil.

Casilli, Antonio A. y Paola Tubaro (2011) “Social Media Censorship in Times of Political Unrest - A Social Simulation Experiment with the UK Riots” Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 115(1).

Castells, Manuel (1996, 1997, 1998) La era de la información, 3 vols. Fayard.

Colin, Nicolas y Henri Verdier (2012) L’âge de la multitude. Armand Colin.

Duha, Olivier (2022) Think Human: The Customer Experience Revolution in the Digital Age. Eyrolles.

Fishkin, James (1993) Democracy and Deliberation, New Directions for Democratie Reform. Yale University Press.

Fishkin, James (1995) The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy. Yale University Press.

Hardt, Michael y Antonio Negri (2004) Multitude. La Découverte.

Hwang, Tim (2020) Subprime attention crisis: Advertising and the time bomb at the heart of the Internet. fsg originals.

Illouz Eva (2019) Les marchandises émotionnelles. L'authenticité au temps du capitalisme. Premier Parallèle.

Jadot, Elisa (2024) Emprise numérique, 5 femmes contre les Big Five [Documental]. Together Media.

Milgram, Stanley (1974) La sumisión a la autoridad: un punto de vista experimental. Harper & Row.

Morozov, Evgeny (2017) “Moral panic over fake news hides the real enemy – the digital giants” The Guardian [en línea]. 8 de enero. Disponible en: <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/08/blaming-fake-news-not-the-answer-democracy-crisis?CMP=twt_gu>

Morozov, Evgeny (2022) Freedom as a Service: The New Digital Feudalism and the Future of the City. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

O’Neil, Cathy (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy? Crown.

Pitron, Guillaume (2021) L’enfer numérique. Voyage au bout d’un like. Les Liens qui libèrent.

Sadin, Eric (2025) “A Paris, un contre-sommet face à la machine à broyer de l’IA, par Eric Sadin” Libération [en línea]. 29 de enero. Disponible en: <https://www.liberation.fr/idees-et-debats/tribunes/a-paris-un-contre-sommet-de-lia-loin-de-la-messe-propagandiste-officielle-par-eric-sadin-20250129_BAV6YZ3S4VGOFNQAQ264DCQO24/>

Tighanimine, Mariame (2023) “¿Son racistas los algoritmos?” Socio (018): 29-57.

Wieviorka, Michel (2013) L’impératif numérique. cnrs.

Zuboff, Shoshana (2020) La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia. Zulma.