Management of a Dental Malocclusion with Mini Implants in Mandibular Shelf and Fixed Appliances. Case Report

Main Article Content

Franklin Paul Ortiz-Garay
Nelinho Enrique Jiménez-Sánchez
Antonio Gómez-Arenas

Abstract

Introduction: Skeletal class III due to prognathism is defined as the anteroposterior disproportion of the mandible in relation to the maxilla. Its origin is multifactorial, and among its most frequent causes are genetic factors, oral habits, and premature loss of primary teeth, among others. The solution to this malocclusion in people who have completed their development is usually surgical or through a compensation treatment as a viable option to correct or mitigate the effects of this condition, offering less invasive and accessible solutions for patients. Objective: To present non-surgical treatment techniques for patients with a class III maxillomandibular relationship due to mandibular prognathism. Case presentation: A 13-year-old female patient who sought orthodontic treatment whose reason for consultation was "I don't like my teeth." The diagnosis showed a straight facial profile, class I skeletal relationship with a tendency to class III due to an ANB of 1°, Ricketts convexity of 0.9°, and Wits -3.9°, Angle class III molar relationship, canine class III, proclination of upper incisors, upper and lower anterior crowding, and anterior and posterior crossbite on the left side. The treatment plan consisted of distalization of the lower arch with the use of mini-implants placed bilaterally on the mandibular shelf. At the end of the treatment, an Angle class I molar relationship, canine class I, posterior crossbite correction, and adequate overjet, overbite, and intercuspation were obtained. Conclusions: The use of mandibular shelf mini-implants is efficient for distalization of the lower dental arch in skeletal Class I patients with tendency towards Class III who present bilateral Angle molar Class III and canine Class III.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ortiz-Garay, F. P., Jiménez-Sánchez, N. E., & Gómez-Arenas, A. (2026). Management of a Dental Malocclusion with Mini Implants in Mandibular Shelf and Fixed Appliances. Case Report. Revista Odontológica Mexicana, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2026.30.1.94937

Citas en Dimensions Service

References

de Angelo BL, Nogueira WA. Tratamento de Classe III com mini-implantes extra alveolares: buccal shelf. J Multidiscip Dent. 2022; 12(2): 93-99. DOI: 10.46875/jmd.v12i2.1102

de Lima E, Brum F, Mezomo M, Pasquali CE, Farret M. Orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion with lower extraction and anchorage with mini implants: Case report. J World Fed Orthod. 2017; 6(1): 28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2017.02.003

Farret MM, Benitez Farret MM. Skeletal class III malocclusion treated using a non-surgical approach supplemented with mini-implants: a case report. J Orthod. 2013; 40(3): 256-263. DOI: 10.1179/1465313313y.0000000046

Ghosh A. Infra-zygomatic crest and buccal shelf-orthodontic bone screws: a leap ahead of micro-implants – clinical perspectives. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2018; 52(4 suppl 2): 127-141. DOI: 10.4103/jios.jios_229_18

Abhijith A, Sahu A, Ranjan R, Roy S, Priya P, Goswami M. Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf area for mini screw placement in different sagittal and vertical skeletal pattern: a CBCT study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 4): S3986-S3991. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_24

Monnerat C, Restle L, Mucha JN. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(4): 428-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.003

Liu Y, Yang ZJ, Zhou J, Xiong P, Wang Q, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of anchorage efficiency of orthodontic mini-implant and conventional anchorage reinforcement in patients requiring maximum orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020; 20(2): 101401. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101401

Liu H, Wu X, Tan J, Li X. Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT. Prog Orthod. 2019; 20(1): 45. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-019-0297-6

Chung K, Kim SH, Kook Y. C-orthodontic microimplant for distalization of mandibular dentition in Class III correction. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(1): 119-128. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075%3C0119:CMFDOM%3E2.0.CO;2

Asscherickx K, Vannet BV, Wehrbein H, Sabzevar MM. Root repair after injury from mini-screw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16(5): 575-578. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01146.x

Chang C, Liu SSY, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85(6): 905-910. DOI: 10.2319/092714.695.1

Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153(4): 505-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.014

Eto VM, Figueiredo NC, Eto LF, Azevedo GM, Silva AIV, Andrade I Jr. Bone thickness and height of the buccal shelf area and the mandibular canal position for miniscrew insertion in patients with different vertical facial patterns, age, and sex. Angle Orthod. 2023; 93(2): 185-194. DOI: 10.2319/060822-412.1

Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(6): 825-829. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.038

Papadopoulos MA, Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP. Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(8): 969–76. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511409236

Chung KR, Kim SH, Choo HR, Kook YA, Cope JB. Distalization of the mandibular dentition with mini-implants to correct a Class III malocclusion with a midline deviation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(1): 135-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.023

Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131(4): S43-S51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.027

Saito S, Sugimoto N, Morohashi T, Ozeki M, Kurabayashi H, Shimizu H, et al. Endosseous titanium implants as anchors for mesiodistal tooth movement in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118(6): 601-607. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.110636

Jing Y, Han X, Guo Y, Li J, Bai D. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular dentition distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143(6): 877-887. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.021

Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(1): 18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032

Sugawara J, Daimaruya T, Umemori M, Nagasaka H, Takahashi I, Kawamura H, et al. Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125(2): 130-138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.003

Poletti L, Silvera AA, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT. Dentoalveolar class III treatment using retromolar miniscrew anchorage. Prog Orthod. 2013; 14(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-7