Tomographic and Periodontal Clinical Parameters Two Years After Surgical Exposition of Maxillary Impacted Canines. Case Series

Main Article Content

María José Mier-Ortiz
Pedro Alberto López-Reynoso
Beatriz Raquel Yáñez-Ocampo
César Esquivel-Chirino

Abstract

Introduction: This report on clinical cases presents the evaluation of periodontal parameters that should be assessed in patients with impacted maxillary canines as predictors of post-operative results. Objective: To evaluate the surgical follow-up after two years, analyzing the tomographic and clinical periodontal parameters of the impacted maxillary canines that underwent an orthodontic traction procedure after exposure by using apical and lateral reposition flaps from existing keratinized tissue. Case presentation: Clinical parameters were evaluated: plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth, keratinized tissue width, and Cairo esthetic score. Tomographic parameters were also evaluated: bone height, bone support, and bone thickness. After two years of post-operative follow-up, clinical parameters showed the absence of plaque in the gingival area, absence of inflammation, bleeding, color change, and absence of periodontal pockets. The width of keratinized tissue obtained was 4.3 mm and it always kept up with the tooth ́s movement. Its aesthetics and quality are comparable to the adjacent tooth. Cone-beam computed tomography showed that the bone height was greater in the labial region and lesser in the palatal region and the percentage of bone support was related to the height of the alveolar crests. The thickness of the labial bone plate was smaller compared to the thickness of the palatal bone plate. Conclusion: The apical-positioned flap and the lateral-positioned flap have been demonstrated as periodontal plastic surgery techniques to maintain an appropriate width of keratinized tissue around natural teeth. In the literature, there are not sufficient reports showing the joint evaluation of clinical and tomographic periodontal parameters, so they must continue to be reported to create an evaluation protocol before canine exposure surgery in the future.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mier-Ortiz, M. J. ., López-Reynoso, P. A. ., Yáñez-Ocampo, B. R. ., & Esquivel-Chirino, C. . (2025). Tomographic and Periodontal Clinical Parameters Two Years After Surgical Exposition of Maxillary Impacted Canines. Case Series. Revista Odontológica Mexicana, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2024.28.3.91108

Citas en Dimensions Service

Author Biographies

María José Mier-Ortiz, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Egresada, Especialidad de Periodoncia e Implantología, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología

Pedro Alberto López-Reynoso, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Docente, Especialidad Periodoncia e Implantología. División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología

Beatriz Raquel Yáñez-Ocampo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Docente, Especialidad Periodoncia e Implantología. División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología

César Esquivel-Chirino, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Docente, Área Básicas Médicas, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología

References

Incerti-Parenti S, Checchi V, Ippolito DR, Gracco A, Alessandri-Bonetti G. Periodontal status after surgical- orthodontic treatment of labially impacted canines with different surgical techniques: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149(4): 463-472. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.019

Grisar K, Fransen J, Smeets M, Hoppenreijs T, Ghaeminia H, Politis C, et al. Surgically assisted orthodontic alignment of impacted maxillary canines: A retrospective analysis of functional and esthetic outcomes and risk factors for failure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159(6): e461-e471. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.019

Henner N, Pignoly M, Antezack A, Monnet-Corti V. Periodontal approach of impacted and retained maxillary anterior teeth. J Dentofacial Anom Orthod. 2018; 21(2): 204. DOI: 10.1051/odfen/2018053

Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC, Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992; 123(3): 91-97. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0069

Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP, Langer B, McGuire MK, Richardson CR, et al. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86(2S): S52-S55. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.140376

Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S, Greenwell H, John V, Kim DM, et al. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86(2S):S73-S76. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.140377

Potrubacz MI, Chimenti C, Marchione L, Tepedino M. Retrospective evaluation of treatment time and efficiency of a predictable cantilever system for orthodontic extrusion of impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 154(1): 55-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.027

Cooke J, Wang HL. Canine impactions: incidence and management. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26(5): 483-91. PMID: 17073358

Cercadillo-Ibarguren I, Gargallo-Albiol J, Abad-Sánchez D, Echeverría-García JJ, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Periodontal health and esthetic results in impacted teeth exposed by apically positioned flap technique. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16(1): e89-95. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e89

Lee JY, Choi YJ, Choi SH, Chung CJ, Yu HS, Kim KH. Labially impacted maxillary canines after the closed eruption technique and orthodontic traction: A split-mouth comparison of periodontal recession. J Periodontol. 2019; 90(1): 35-43: 10.1002/JPER.18-0034

Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(4): 705-710. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565

Guo R, Zhang L, Hu M, Huang Y, Li W. Alveolar bone changes in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 24(2): 165-179. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12421

Castro LO, Castro IO, de Alencar AHG, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of distance from cemento-enamel junction to alveolar crest before and after nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86(4): 543-549. DOI: 10.2319/040815-235.1

Kohavi D, Becker A, Zilberman Y. Surgical exposure, orthodontic movement, and final tooth position as factors in periodontal breakdown of treated palatally impacted canines. Am J Orthod. 1984; 85(1): 72-77. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90124-6

Mandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L. Cone-beam computed tomography and interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review focusing on risk assessment of the dentoalveolar bone changes influenced by tooth movement. J Periodontol. 2017; 88(10): 960-977. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.160781