Assessment of Secondary Implant Stability by its Response to Percussion. Case Report
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Determining the ideal time for functional loading of dental implants represents a complex clinical challenge, as multiple factors are involved and each option presents its own risks, advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, it is important to consider implant stability, because it is necessary for osseointegration and it is an essential requirement for implant rehabilitation, as well as for its long-term success. For this purpose, the Anycheck® device measures implant stability non-invasively, reducing the risk of failure in implants that replace lost teeth. Objective: To determine the stability of a dental implant using the Neobiotech AnyCheck® implant stability meter. Case presentation: 39-year-old male patient with tooth 16 missing. Surgical and prosthetic planning was performed. An Ø 5.00, 10 mm long mis® implant was placed and left submerged for 12 weeks; subsequently, stability was measured with the AnyCheck® dental implant stability meter. Conclusions: Stability is affected by numerous factors, however, devices such as the AnyCheck® stability meter allow the stability of dental implants to be measured non-invasively, and their evolution can be monitored over time. Furthermore, it can be done without removing the healing abutment and therefore without the risk of causing bone resorption.
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Luengas-Aguirre MI, Sáenz-Martínez LP, Tenorio-Torres G, Garcilazo-Gómez A, Díaz-Franco MA. Aspectos sociales y biológicos del edentulismo en México: un problema visible de las inequidades en salud. Ciencias Clínicas. 2015; 16(2): 29-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cc.2015.12.002
Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020; 39(2): 167-172. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-140
The Academy of Prosthodontics. The glossary of prosthodontic terms: Ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117(5S): e1-e105. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001
Huang H, Wu G, Hunziker E. The clinical significance of implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements: A literature review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020; 10(4): 629-638. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.004
Monje A, Ravidà A, Wang HL, Helms JA, Brunski JB. Relationship between primary/mechanical and secondary/biological implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34(Suppl): s7-s23B. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.19suppl.g1
Pandey C, Rokaya D, Bhattarai BP. Contemporary concepts in osseointegration of dental implants: A review. Biomed Res Int. 2022; 6170452. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6170452
Bafijari D, Benedetti A, Stamatoski A, Baftijari F, Susak Z, Veljanovski D. Influence of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements for successful osseointegration of dental implants during the healing period and its impact on implant assessed by Osstell Mentor Device. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(23): 4110-4115. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.716
Ahmad OK, Kelly JR. Assessment of the primary stability of dental implants in artificial bone using resonance frequency and percussion analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28(1): 89-95. PMID: 23377052
Díaz-Castro MC, Falcao A, López-Jarana P, Falcao C, Ríos-Santos JV, Fernández-Palacín A, et al. Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019; 24(5): e636-e642. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22761
Lim HK, Lee SJ, Jeong Y, Lee JS, Ryu JJ, Shim JS, et al. Clinical validation of dental implant stability by newly designed damping capacity assessment device during the healing period. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(11):1570. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58111570
Okuhama Y, Nagata K, Kim H, Tsuruoka H, Atsumi M, Kawana H. Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: A clinical research study. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1): 286. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0
Lee DH, Shin YH, Park JH, Shim JS, Shin SW, Lee JY. The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020; 12(2): 83-88. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.83

Revista Odontológica Mexicana por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom.