Semi-Chairside Workflow for Ceramic Veneers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: 3D technology and digital dentistry software allow prior planning and visualization of results, improving the effectiveness of the professional in situations of high complexity and aesthetic demand, such as treatments on anterior teeth. Objective: To present a semi-chairside workflow for ceramic veneers, using cad/cam technology in the clinic and laboratory to achieve aesthetic restorations quickly and efficiently. Case presentation: A 42-year-old female patient, resident in Santiago, Chile, whose four maxillary incisors were treated with a semi-chairside workflow to correct size, shape and colour. It began with clinical whitening in three sessions, then the mock-up technique was employed as a diagnostic method with the digital smile design previously carried out in the Dentalcad® software. Once the preparations were completed, the digital impression was taken with Cerec® software and merged with the initial design in the InLab cad v. 22.0 software. The restorations were milled on a Cerec mc xl milling machine from ips e.max® cad blocks. The colour was adjusted with ips Ivocolor® stains and the cementation process was executed with dual resin cement through the protocol for glass ceramics. Conclusions: The utilisation of digital impression equipment is the basis for integrating the smile design developed in laboratory software and dental preparations, facilitating the replication of the entire initial design in the final restorations thanks to the correct communication between the professional and the laboratory and the management of cad/cam technology in semi-chairside workflows.
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
El-Mowafy O, El-Aawar N, El-Mowafy N. Porcelain veneers: An update. Dent Med Probl. 2018; 55(2): 207-211. DOI: 10.17219/dmp/90729
Zandinejad A, Lin WS, Atarodi M, Abdel-Azim T, Metz MJ, Morton D. Digital workflow for virtually designing and milling ceramic lithium disilicate veneers: A clinical report. Oper Dent. 2015; 40(3): 241-246. DOI: 10.2341/13-291-S
Reshad M, Cascione D, Magne P. Diagnostic mock-ups as an objective tool for predictable outcomes with porcelain laminate veneers in esthetically demanding patients: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99(5): 333-339. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)00056-5
Garcia PP, da Costa RG, Calgaro M, Ritter AV, Correr GM, da Cunha LF, et al. Digital smile design and mock-up technique for esthetic treatment planning with porcelain laminate veneers. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21(4): 455-458. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_172_18
Venturini AB, Dapieve KS, de Kok P, Pereira GKR, Valandro LF, Kleverlaan CJ. Effect of the region of the CAD/CAM block on the flexural strength and structural reliability of restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 138: 105597. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105597
Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 134. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x
Pires LA, Novais PM, Araújo VD, Pegoraro LF. Effects of the type and thickness of ceramic, substrate, and cement on the optical color of a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117(1): 144-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.003
Bayazıt EÖ, Karabıyık M. Chairside restorations of maxillary anterior teeth with CAD/CAM porcelain laminate veneers produced by digital workflow: A case report with a step to facilitate restoration design. Case Rep Dent. 2019; 2019: 6731905. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6731905
Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14: 10. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
Skramstad MJ. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC. Int J Comput Dent. 2019; 22(1): 69-78. PMID: 30848256
Blatz MB, Conejo J. The current state of chairside digital dentistry and materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 63(2): 175-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002
Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(3): 555-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010; 38(7): 553-559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
Nejatidanesh F, Savabi G, Amjadi M, Abbasi M, Savabi O. Five-year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers - a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62(4): 462-467. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.004
Revista Odontológica Mexicana por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom.