From Mockery to Advocacy: Dissecting LGBTQ+ Narratives in Mexican Spanish-Language Media
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the discourses on LGBTQ+ rights in Mexico by analyzing Spanish-language YouTube comments, to understand how discrimination, marginalization, and social perceptions of LGBTQ+ individuals are constructed and reproduced in digital spaces.
Methodological design: A qualitative approach grounded in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA, following Fairclough’s four-stage model (2013), was employed. A corpus titled LGBTQ+dis was compiled from comments on 16 YouTube videos selected using intuitive search terms related to LGBTQ+ topics. A filtered subset of 5 496 comments containing relevant terms was retained from an initial pool of 27 438 comments, resulting in a corpus of 421 639 words. The AntConc software was used to examine concordances and word frequencies.
Results: The analysis revealed widespread use of discriminatory language, stereotypes, and exclusionary themes, reflecting broader societal prejudices against LGBTQ+ individuals. Nonetheless, the comments also included expressions of solidarity, support, and advocacy, highlighting YouTube as a contested space where both marginalizing and empowering discourses coexist.
Research limitations: The use of intuitively selected search terms and publicly available comments limits the data´s representativeness and excludes perspectives from less digitally active users.
Findings: Digital discourse on LGBTQ+ issues in Mexico reveals tension between dominant narratives of exclusion and emergent counter-narratives advocating for equality and recognition. These dynamics emphasize the importance of fostering inclusive digital literacy and public awareness to challenge discriminatory discourse and promote LGBTQ+ communities’ visibility and dignity.
Downloads
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Aguilar, R. (2024. March 13). El PAN: liberal y conservador. El Economista. https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/opinion/PAN-liberal-y-conservador-20131006-0001.html
Åkerlund, M. (2019). Representations of trans people in Swedish newspaper. Journalism Studies, 20 (9), 1319-1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1513816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1513816
Anthony, L. (2023). AntConc (Version 4.2.4) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Baker, P. (2005). Public discourses of gay men. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203643532
Baker, P. (2008). Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. Equinox. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781845535865
Baker, P. (2014). Bad wigs and screaming mimis’: Using corpus-assisted techniques to carry out critical discourse analysis of the representation of trans people in the British press. Contemporary critical discourse studies, 211-235. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593634.ch-009
Baker, P. (2018). Language, sexuality and corpus linguistics: Concerns and future directions. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 7 (2), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17018.bak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17018.bak
Bailey, A. (2019). “Girl-on-girl culture” Constructing normative identities in a corpus of sex advice for queer women. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 8 (2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.18013.bai DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.18013.bai
Burgess, J. & Green, J. (2013). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. John Wiley & Sons.
Butler, J. (2024). Who's afraid of gender? Farrar, Straus & Girou.
Choi, A. (2023, April 6). Record number of anti-LGBT bills have been introduced this year. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/06/politics/anti-lgbtq-plus-state-bill-rights-dg/index.html
Diez, J. (2011). La trayectoria política del movimiento Lésbico-Gay en México. Estudios sociológicos, 687-712. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/598/59823584010.pdf
Fairclough, N. (2017). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13-25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-2
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In J.P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds). The routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068
González, M. H. (2019). Contra el agandalle de la tira. El surgimiento del Movimiento de Liberación Homosexual y la resistencia a las razias policiacas en la ciudad de México, 1978-1984. Sémata: Ciencias Sociais e Humanidades (31). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/s.31.6003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/s.31.6003
González, M. H. (2021). Vestidas para marchar. Travestismo, identidad y protesta en los primeros años del Movimiento de Liberación Homosexual en México, 1978- 1984. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios de Género de El Colegio de México, 7, e582. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24201/reg.v7i1.582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/reg.v7i1.582
Gruzinski, S. (1986). Las cenizas del deseo. Homosexuales novohispanos a mediados del siglo XVII. In S. Ortega (Ed.), De la santidad a la perversión o de por qué no se cumplía la ley de Dios en la sociedad novohispana (pp. 255-290). Grijalbo.
Hunt, S. (2021). The South African news media and representations of sexuality. In J. Angouri, & J. Baxter (Eds.), The routledge handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 587-601). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315514857-47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315514857-47
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [Inegi] (2021). Encuesta Nacional sobre Diversidad Sexual y de Género (Endiseg). https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/endiseg/2021/
Jones, L. (2020). Subverting transphobia and challenging ignorance: The interactive construction of resistant identity in a community of practice of transgender youth. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.18488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.18488
Jones, L. (2021). Queer linguistics and identity: The past decade. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 10 (1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.00010.jon DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.00010.jon
Jones, R. Chik, A., & Hafner, C. (2015). Discourse and Digital Practices. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465
López, E. (2022). Radiografía de los derechos subnacionales LGBT+ en México y sus mecanismos de aprobación. Andamios, 19 (49), 361-390. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1870-00632022000200361&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v19i49.934
Mautner, G. (2022). What can a corpus tell us about the discourse? In A. O’Keeffe, & M.J. McCarthy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of corpora (pp. 250-262). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367076399-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367076399-18
Monsiváis, C. (8 of November, 2001). La gran redada. La Jornada. https://www.jornada.com.mx/2001/11/08/ls-monsivais.html
Morrish, L. & Sauntson, H. (2007). New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Palgrave Macmillan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599406
Motschenbacher, H. (2018a). Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies: Taking stock and future directions.” Journal of Language and Sexuality, 7 (2) 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot
Motschenbacher, H. (2018b). Sexuality in critical discourse studies. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 388-402). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-27
Ortega, S. (1988). El discurso teológico de Santo Tomás de Aquino sobre el matrimonio, la familia y los comportamientos sexuales. In J. Mortíz (ed.), El placer de pecar y el afán de normar (pp. 15-78). Contrapuntos.
Page, R., Unger, J. Zappavigna, M., & Barton, D. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786
Pierceson, J. Piatti-Crocker, A., & Schulenberg, S. (2010). Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas: Policy Innovation for Same-Sex Relationships. Lexington Books. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1531426x00004027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9780739146576
Raun, T. (2016). Out Online: Trans self-representation and community building on YouTube. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315599229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315599229
Ryan, J. M. (2019). Communicating trans identity: Toward an understanding of the selection and significance of gender identity-based terminology. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 8 (2), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19001.rya DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19001.rya
Suárez, M. (1999). Sexualidad y norma sobre lo prohibido. La Ciudad de México y las postrimerías del virreinato. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Vázquez., J. C., Coss y León, D., & Salinas, O. (2019). Una aproximación histórico-social a la evolución de los derechos de la comunidad LGBTI+ en México. Revista humanidades, 9 (2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15517/h.v9i2.37751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/h.v9i2.37751
Wynne, M. (2008). Searching and concordancing. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics (pp. 706-737). Walter de Gruyter.
Zimman, L. (2014). The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. In L. Zimman, J. Davis, & J. Raclaw (Eds). Queer excursions: Retheorizing binaries in language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 13-34). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002
Zottola, A. (2018). Transgender identity labels in the British press: A corpus-based discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 7 (2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17017.zot DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17017.zot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento recognizes and respects the moral rights of authors as well as ownership rights transferred in non-exclusivity to the journal for its open access dissemination and its preservation. Hence, authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is distributed under a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional, which allows the information and metadata to be used without commercial ends as long as proper citation is utilized.
Authors will have the right to non-exclusively distribute the contribution made to Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. That is, they will be able to include it in an institutional repository or disseminate it in other digital or printed media as long as it is explicitly stated that it was first published in Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. The following information must additionally be included: author, year, volume, page numbers, electronic paging, and DOI.
Authors, whose publications have been accepted, will have to send the Letter of Copyright Transfer in the corresponding format, filled out and signed by the author or authors.