The Institutional design of anticorruption public policy and differentiated effects at the subnational level: an analysis from political culture in Mexico.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper analyzes the institutional design of the anticorruption policy of the Mexican State —since 2015 constitutional reform— has generated different effects at the subnational level of government. Although this scenario was expected, it is pertinent to ask: Why have institution building and policy-making—under the same concept of an anti-corruption system—taken different paths at the subnational level in Mexico? This paper discusses the relationship between the final effect and the invariability of the principles and values of political culture in Mexico. For this purpose, the methodology of process tracing and general data analysis of the National Survey of Government Quality and Impact (ENCIG) and the National Survey of Civic Culture (ENCUCI) is applied.
Downloads
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Camacho Pérez, Jason Alexis (2020) ‘Participación ciudadana para el combate a la corrupción. Un análisis del Comité de Participación Ciudadana del Sistema Nacional Anticorrupción’, Revista Buen Gobierno, (28).
Collier, David (2011) ‘Understanding process tracing’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), pp. 823–830.
Damijan, Sandra (2023) ‘Corruption: A review of issues’, Economic and Business Review, 25(1), pp. 1–10.
González Delgado, Israel (2023) Los males necesarios. Elementos para el análisis político y jurídico. Ensayos. Ciudad de México: Tirant lo Blanch.
Manara, Muhammad Untung, Damayanti, Ratih Indriyani, Setiawan, Bambang, Nugroho, Haryanto y Arifianto, Alexander Roni (2023) ‘Exploring the path to corruption–An informed grounded theory study on the decision-making process underlying corruption’, PLOS ONE, 18(9), e0291819.
Mauro, Paolo (1995) ‘Corruption and growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), pp. 681–712.
Morris, Stephen David (2020) ‘Lo que la corrupción rindió: corrupción y culturas’, Encrucijada. Revista electrónica del Centro de Estudios en Administración Pública, (37), pp. 24–44.
Olken, Benjamin A. y Pande, Rohini (2012) ‘Corruption in developing countries’, Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), pp. 479–509.
Putnam, Robert D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sabatier, Paul A. y Weible, Christopher M. (eds.) (2014) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sandoval Ballesteros, Irma Eréndira (2023) ‘Institucionalización vs burocratización en el combate a la corrupción en México’, Gestión y Política Pública, 32(2), pp. 29–59.
Thompson, Dennis Frank (2018) ‘Theories of institutional corruption’, Annual Review of Political Science, 21, pp. 495–513.
Warren, Mark E. (2023) ‘Corruption and political institutions’, European Journal of Political Theory, [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851231186702
Documentos gubernamentales y legislación:
Congreso de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (última reforma) Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Disponible en: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/CPEUM.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2023) Encuesta Nacional de Calidad e Impacto Gubernamental (ENCIG) 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021 y 2023. Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/encig/2023/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2020) Encuesta Nacional de Cultura Cívica (ENCUCI). Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/encuci/2020/#tabulados
Secretaría Ejecutiva del Sistema Nacional Anticorrupción (2019) Guía para el Diseño de Políticas Estatales Anticorrupción. Disponible en: https://www.sesna.gob.mx/2019/04/10/guia-para-el-diseno-de-politicas-estatales-anticorrupcion/
