Root canal obturation, X-ray, scanner X-ray, radiovisiography, Cone Beam computed tomography.

Resumen

Root canal obturation needs to preserve optimal clinical conditions for achieving success in patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate endodontic obturation performed by the lateral condensation technique with manual and rotary instruments. Thirty extracted incisors were divided into two groups according to instrumentation technique: group 1-RCSMA57 + Sealapex® and group 2-spreader iRace #30 + Sealapex®. All samples were decoronated and standardized at 10 mm, intraradicular instrumentation were performed with Gates-Glidden #3, and the protocols of irrigation that were employed were 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA during instrumentation. Finally, the groups were obturated with the lateral condensation technique. The samples were observed with conventional X-ray, scanner X-ray, radiovisiography, and Cone Beam computed tomography techniques. For evaluation, a scale of canal obturation density (0 = suitable, 1 = acceptable, 2 = fair, and 3 = inadequate) was employed by blinded evaluator. A value of canal obturation density was assigned in each sample. A statistical analysis by the χ2 of Pearson with a significance level of 0.05% was employed. All groups showed different values according to the instrumentation technique employed. The rotary instrument gave better results than manual instruments according to the values expressed (p = 0.004). The both instruments can be used in the obturation lateral technique; however, the rotary instrument provides better conditions for this technique.