Varieties of Capitalism: An Alternative Theory to the Hegemonic Idea of Globalization
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the theoretical dispute set forth by political science against the theory of convergence, better known in the economic and sociological fields as globalization, through the Varieties of Capitalism (VoC) theory and its derivations. The theoretical comparative analysis method is used in order to establish the characteristics of welfare models and the capital/labor ratio. The scope and limitations of capitalism’s variety theories based on historical institutionalism, path dependence and rational choice are analyzed to determine their level of statism and ability to understand change, and some of the current derivations of said theory are analyzed as well.
Downloads
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Acemoglu, Daron; Johnson, Simon; Robinson, James y Yunyong Thaicharoen (2003) “Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symptoms: Volatility, Crisis and Growth. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: an Empirical Investigation” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1): 49-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00208-8
Aguirre Julio y Rubén Lo Vuolo (2013) Variedades de Capitalismo. Una aproximación al estudio comparado del capitalismo y sus aplicaciones para América Latina. Documento de Trabajo 85, CIEPP.
Amable, Bruno (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Arnson, Cynthia y José Raúl Perales (2007) The ‘New Left’ and Democratic Governance in Latin America. Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Latin American Program.
Ban, Cornel (2019) “Dependent Development at a Crossroads? Romanian Capitalism and its Contradictions” Journal West European Politics, 42(5): 1041-1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1537045
Beck, Ulrich (1998) ¿Qué es la globalización? Falacias del globalismo, respuestas a la globalización. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
Bizberg, Ilán (2014) Variedades de capitalismo en América Latina: los casos de México, Brasil, Argentina y Chile. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.
Bizberg, Ilán (2019) Diversity of Capitalisms in Latin America. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95537-7
Block, Fred (2019) “Problems with the Concept of Capitalism in the Social Sciences” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19838866
Collier, Ruth y David Collier (1991) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Content, Jeroen; Frenken, Koen y Jacob Jordaan (2019) “Does Related Variety Foster Regional Entrepreneurship? Evidence from European Regions” Journal Regional Studies, 53(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1595565
Deeg, Richard y Gregory Jackson (2007) “The State of the Art. Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety” Socio-Economic Review, 5(1): 149-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl021
Delanty, Gerard (2019) “The Future of Capitalism: Trends, Scenarios and Prospects for the Future” Journal of Classical Sociology, 19(1): 10-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X18810569
Emmenegger, Patrick (2010) “Low Statism in Coordinated Market Economies: The Development of Job Security Regulations in Switzerland” International Political Science Review, 31(2): 187-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110364260
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1993) Los tres mundos del estado de bienestar. Buenos Aires: Edicions Alfons El Magnánim.
Estrin, Saul; Zhixiang, Liang; Chapiro, Daniel y Michael Carney (2019) “State Capitalism, Economic Systems and the Performance of State Owned Firms” Acta Oeconomica, 69(s1): 175-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2019.69.S1.11
Etchemendy, Sebastián (2011) “Legacies for the Liberalized Economy and Varieties of Capitalism in Developing World Comparative Perspectives in Ibero-America” en Models of Economic Liberalization: Business, Workers and Compensation in Latin America, Spain and Portugal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511835223
Ewald, Kibler; Salmivaara, Virva; Stenholm, Pekka y Siri Terjesen (2018) “The Evaluate Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship in Capitalist Welfare Systems” Journal of World Business, 53(6): 944-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.08.002
Farkas, Beáta (2019) “Quality of Governance and Varieties of Capitalism in the European Union: Core and Periphery Division?” Post-Communist Economies, 31(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2018.1537740
Gélinas, Jacques (2006) El monstruo de la globalización. Desafíos y alternativas, trad. Jorge Parra. Medellín: Hombre Nuevo Editores.
Giddens, Anthony (2007) Un mundo desbocado: los efectos de la globalización en nuestras vidas. Ciudad de México: Taurus.
Giddens, Anthony (2008) La constitución de la sociedad. Bases para la teoría de la estructuración. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.
Haggard, Sthephan y Robert Kaufman (2008) Development, Democracy and Welfare States. Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hall, Peter (2009) “The Role of Interests, Institutions and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations” en Lichbach, Marck Irving y Alan Zuckermann (2009). Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Peter y David Soskice (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
Hancké, Bob; Rohdes, Martin y Mark Thatcher (2007) “Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism” en Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206483.003.0001
Hernández López, Mario Humberto (2017) “Variedades de capitalismo, implicaciones para el desarrollo de América Latina” Economía: teoría y práctica (46): 195-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/ETYPUAM/NE/462017/HernandezLopez
Iversen, Torben y David Soskice (2011) “Inequality and Redistribution: A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions” Revue Economique, 62(4): 629-649 [en línea]. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27975897
Jessop, Bob (2019) “Ordoliberalism and Neoliberalization: Governing through Order or Disorder” Critical Sociology, 45(7-8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519834068
Kitschelt, Herbert; Rosas, Guillermo; Zechmeister, Elizabeth; Luna, Juan Pablo y Kirk Hawkins (2010) Latin American Party Systems. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Levi, Margaret (1997) “A Model, A Method, and A Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis” en Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, Steven y Kenneth Roberts (2011) The Resurgence of The Latin American Left. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkings University Press.
Mazzuca, Sebastián (2012) “The Rise of Rentier Populism” Journal of Democracy, 24(2): 108-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0034
McAdam, Doug; Tarrow, Sidney y Charles Tilly (1997) “Toward an Integrated Perspective on Social Movements and Revolution” en Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murillo, María Victoria (2009) Political Competition, Partisanship and Policymaking in Latin American Public Utilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murillo, María Victoria; Oliveros, Virginia y Milan Vaishnav (2011) “Economic Constrains and Presidential Agency” en Levitsky, Steven y Kenneth Roberts (eds.) The Resurgence of Latin American Left. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nolke, Andreas y Arjan Vliegenthart (2009) “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism. The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe” World Politics, 61(4): 670-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098
Pierson, Paul (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805288
Pierson, Paul (1996) “The New Politics of Welfare State” World Politics, Volume, 48(2): 143179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004
Pierson, Paul (2004) “Long Term Process” en History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princenton/Oxford: Princenton University Press.
Pierson, Paul y Theda Skocpol (2002) “Historical Institutionalism In Contemporary Political Science” en Katznelson, Ira y Helen Milner (eds.) Political Science: The State Of The Discipline. Washington: Columbia University, American Political Science Association.
Roberts, Kenneth (2008) “The Movilization of Opposition to Economic Liberalization” Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 327-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. polisci.11.053006.183457
Rhodes, Roderick; Binder, Sarah y Bert Rockman (2006) The Oxford handbook of political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rudra, Nita (2002) “Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less Developed Countries” International Organization, 56(2): 411-445. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1162/002081802320005522
Schneider, Ben Ross (2009) “Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America” Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(3): 553-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X09990186
Schneider Ben Ross y David Soskice (2009) “Inequality in Developed Countries and Latin America: Coordinated, Liberal and Hierarchical Systems” Economy and Society, 38(1): 17-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140802560496
Soysa, Indra de (2019) “Is Islam Compatible with Free-Market Capitalism? An Empirical Analysis, 1970–2010” Politics and Religions, 12(12): 227-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048318000780
Steinmo, Sven (1989) “Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden and Britain”. World Politics, 41(4): 500-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010528
Streeck, Wolfgang y Kathleen Thelen (2005) “Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies” en Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Streeck, Wolfgang y Kozo Yamamura (2005) “Introduction: Exploring into the Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism in Germany and Japan” en The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism. Germany and Japan in Comparison. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Thelen, Kathleen (1999) “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics” Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 369-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
Thelen, Kathleen (2001) “Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracy” en Hall, Peter y David Soskice (eds.) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.003.0002
Walker, Kent; Zhang, Zhou y (Nina) Na Ni (2019) “The Mirror Effect: Corporate Social Responsability, Corporate Social Irresponsability and Firm Performance in Coordinated Market Economies and Liberal Market Economies” British Journal of Management, 30(1): 151-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12271
Wei Hu, Helen; Cui, Lin y Preet Aulakh (2019) “State Capitalism and Performance Persistence of Business Group-affiliated Firms: A Comparative Study of China and India” Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2): 193-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0165-5
Weyland, Kurt; Hunter, Wendy y Raúl Madrid (2009) Leftist Governments in Latin America. Success and Shortcomings. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Yashar, Deborah (2005) “The Argument. Indigenous Mobilization in Latin America” en Contesting Citizenship in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
La Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales publicada por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmcpys/
La RMCPyS autoriza a sus colaboradores que suban una copia de sus trabajos publicados en sus webs personales o en cualquier repositorio de acceso abierto, siempre y cuando se mencione específicamente a la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales como fuente original de procedencia, citando el año y número del ejemplar respectivo y añadiendo el enlace a la página web donde este órgano editorial puede ser consultado in toto, de manera abierta y gratuita en: <www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmcpys>.
Las y los lectores tienen libertad para:
Compartir, copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
De acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Atribución: la/el lector/a debe reconocer el crédito de una obra de manera adecuada, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciante o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
- No comercial: la/el lector/a no puede hacer uso del material con fines comerciales.
- Si se mezcla, transforma o se desarrolla a partir de la obra licenciada, no se permite la distribución del material modificado.
Cargos por gestión de artículos
La Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales NO cobra tarifas por recibir, procesar o publicar los artículos (Article Processing Charge [APC]) enviados por los autores.