INCOMPLETE FISCAL FEDERALISM AND SECESSIONIST THREAT IN MEXICO

Main Article Content

Bruno Sovilla
Cristal Edali Morales Velasco

Abstract

Since the fiscal decentralization process began in 1980, territorial inequality among the poorest and richest regions of the Mexican Republic has grown.


In this work, states are divided into two groups: Those that contribute more to the federal budget than they receive and are considered fiscally surplus, and those that contribute less and are in deficit.


It is shown that the fiscal deficit of the poorest states has been able to be financed through oil revenues. However, this situation is not sustainable and to maintain the current levels of transfers to the most deficient regions, it will be necessary to squeeze more from the taxpayers of the richest states.


Without a new fiscal pact between the states, demands for greater autonomy in the richest regions will increase, as has recently happened in other countries.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sovilla, B., & Morales Velasco, C. E. (2025). INCOMPLETE FISCAL FEDERALISM AND SECESSIONIST THREAT IN MEXICO. Investigación Económica, 84(332), 84–112. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2025.332.90846

Citas en Dimensions Service

References

Arrow, K.J. (1969). The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non-market allocation. The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System, 1, 59-73.

Buchanan, J.M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2552442

Castells, A. (1999). Haciendas locales, autonomía y responsabilidad fiscal. Gestión y Política Pública, 8(2), 277-297.

El Universal. (2021, 13 de enero). “En el norte trabajamos y en el sur descansan”, reaccionan en redes a dichos de Samuel García. El Universal. [en línea] Disponible en: <https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion/samuel-garcia-en-el-norte-trabajamos-y-en-el-sur-descansan-reaccionan-en-redes-sociales/>.

Garza, A. (2019, 26 de febrero). El sur de México tiene la desgracia de la flojera: ‘El Bronco’. Excelsior. [en línea] Disponible en: <https://www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/el-sur-de-mexico-tiene-la-desgracia-de-la-flojera-el-bronco/1298770>.

Hernández, F. e Iturribarria, H. (2003). Tres trampas del federalismo fiscal mexicano [CIDE Documento de trabajo no. 281]. División de Economía, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, México.

Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.

Oates, W.E. (1977). Federalismo fiscal. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local.

Oates, W.E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9

Prud’homme, R. (1994). On the dangers of decentralization [Policy Research Working Paper no. 1252). World Bank Group, Washington, DC.

Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.

Samuelson, P. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of a public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37(4), 350-356.

Tijerina, J.A. (2002). Una exploración de las implicaciones de la teoría del federalismo fiscal en México. Revista de Economía de la Universidad de Nuevo León, 21(1), 37-78.

Weingast, B.R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005

FUENTES ESTADÍSTICAS

CONEVAL (2008-2022). Estadísticas de pobreza en Chiapas. [en línea] Disponible en: <https://www.coneval.org.mx/coordinacion/entidades/Chiapas/Paginas/principal.aspx>.

CONEVAL (2023). Estadísticas de pobreza en México. [en línea] Disponible en: <https://www.coneval.org.mx/>.

INEGI (1990-2021). Producto interno bruto por entidad federativa (PIBE). [en línea] Disponible en: <https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/pibent/2013/>.