La accesibilidad a los servicios públicos desde la representación política: revisión de literatura en América Latina
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la literatura sobre la accesibilidad a servicios públicos desde un punto de vista de representación territorial. Durante mucho tiempo la representación política se estudiaba desde el punto de vista de la elaboración de políticas públicas. En este estudio se parte de una concepción multidimensional, tomando también en cuenta la distribución de recursos y servicio al distrito. Además, previamente se había estudiado el caso estadounidense, sin embargo, en América Latina existe evidencia de que es un fenómeno importante, por lo que resulta fundamental revisar los estudios para la región. Se identifican condiciones institucionales, partidarias, individuales y características del distrito que influencian la responsividad hacia el distrito electoral
Downloads
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Aidt, T. S., & Shvets, J. (2012). Distributive Politics and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Seven US State Legislatures. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.3.1
Andeweg, R. B., & Thomassen, J. J. A. (2005). Modes of Political Representation: Toward a New Typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(4), 507-528. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201653
André, A., Bradbury, J., & Depauw, S. (2014). Constituency Service in Multi-level Democracies. Regional & Federal Studies, 24(2), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.858708
André, A., Depauw, S., & Deschouwer, K. (2014). Legislators’ local roots: Disentangling the effect of district magnitude. Party Politics, 20(6), 904-917. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812458617
André, A., Depauw, S., & Martin, S. (2015). Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies, 48(4), 464-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014545512
Armesto, M. A. (2012). Gasto particularista en bienes públicos locales: Índice de desviación. Revista mexicana de sociología. 74(3). 395-428.
Arvate, P. R. (2013). Electoral Competition and Local Government Responsiveness in Brazil. World Development. 43. 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.11.004
Ashworth, S., & Mesquita, E. B. D. (2006). Delivering the Goods: Legislative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings. The Journal of Politics. 68(1). 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00378.x
Bagashka, T., & Clark, J. H. (2016). Electoral Rules and Legislative particularism: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures. The American Political Science Review. 110(3). 441-456.
Baron, D. P. (1991). Majoritarian Incentives, Pork Barrel Programs, and Procedural Control. American Journal of Political Science. 35(1). 57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111438
Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A., & Fiorina, M. P. (1984). The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament. The American Political Science Review, 78(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961252
Carey, J. M. (2007). Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science. 51(1). 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
Carey, J. M. (2009). Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge University Press.
Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies. 14(4), 417-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
Castañeda-Angarita, N. (2013). Party system nationalization, presidential coalitions, and government spending. Electoral Studies. 32(4), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.03.005
Chasquetti, D., & Micozzi, J. P. (2014). The Subnational Connection in Unitary Regimes: Progressive Ambition and Legislative Behavior in Uruguay: Unitary Regimes. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 39(1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12034
Clarke, H. D. (1978). Determinants of Provincial Constituency Service Behaviour: A Multivariate Analysis. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 3(4), 601. https://doi.org/10.2307/439617
Connolly, J. M., & Mason, D. P. (2016). Ideology and Local Public Expenditure Priorities. Political Research Quarterly. 69(4), 830-841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916665702
Crisp, B. F. (2007). Incentives in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: General Election Laws, Candidate Selection Procedures, and Cameral Rules. Comparative Political Studies. 40(12), 1460-1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007301703
Crisp, B. F., Escobar-Lemmon, M. C., Jones, B. S., Jones, M. P., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2004). VoteSeeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies. The Journal of Politics. 66(3), 823-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00278.x
David Mayhew. (1974). The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.
David Samuels. (2003). Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
Díaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., & Ruiz-Euler, A. (2014). Traditional Governance, Citizen Engagement and Local Public Goods: Evidence from Mexico. World Development. 53, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.008
Ellickson, M. C., & Whistler, D. E. (2001). Explaining State Legislators’ Casework and Public Resource Allocations. Political Research Quarterly. 54(3), 553. https://doi.org/10.2307/449270
Eulau, H., & Karps, P. D. (1977). The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.2307/439340
Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. HarperCollins. Fraga, L. R., Lopez, L., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Ramirez, R. (2013). Gender and ethnicity: Patterns of electoral success and legislative advocacy among Latina and Latino state officials in four states. In Intersectionality and Politics (121-145). Routledge.
Gainza, X., & Livert, F. (2021). The electoral bias: The political economy of subnational transfers in Latin America. Regional Studies. 55(6), 1032-1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861235
Gallagher, M., & Mitchell, P. (Eds.). (2005). The politics of electoral systems. Oxford University Press.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
Gary Cox & Matthew Mc Cubbins. (2001). The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes. Presidents, Parliaments and Policy (Stephan Haggard y Matthew Mc Cubbins, 21-63). Cambridge University Press.
Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti, Roberto Perotti, & Massimo Rostagno. (2001). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. 117(2), 609-657.
Habel, P., & Birch, S. (2019). A field experiment on the effects of ethnicity and socioeconomic status on the quality of representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 44(3), 389-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12230
Harden, J. J. (2013). Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities: Multidimensional Responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 38(2), 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12009
Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2006). The influence of candidate selection methods on legislatures and legislators: Theoretical propositions, methodological suggestions and empirical evidence. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 12(3-4), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600875647
Heitshusen, V., Young, G., & Wood, D. M. (2005). Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00108.x
Herrick, R. (2010). Sex Differences in Constituent Engagement. Social Science Quarterly. 91(4), 947-963.
Holtzman, A. (1986). Empire and Representation: The U. S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 11(2), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/439878
Instituto de Iberoamérica. 2019. “Observatorio de Élites Parlamentarias en América Latina”. https://oir.org.es/pela/
Itzkovitch-Malka, R., & Hazan, R. Y. (2017). Unpacking Party Unity: The Combined Effects of Electoral Systems and Candidate Selection Methods on Legislative Attitudes and Behavioural Norms. Political Studies, 65(2), 452-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716634094
Jeffrey W. Knopf. (2006). Doing a Literature Review. Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 127-132.
Johannes, J. R. (1983). Political Culture & Congressional Constituency Service. Polity, 15(4), 555-572.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3234456
Jones, B. D. (1973). Competitiveness, Role Orientations, and Legislative Responsiveness. The Journal of Politics, 35(4), 924-947. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129214
Juan Moraes. (2008). Why factions? Candidate Selection and Legislative Politics in Uruguay. Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America (Scott Morgenstern y Peter Siavelis). Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kallhoff, A. (2014). Why societies need public goods. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(6), 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.904539
Keefer, P., & Khemani, S. (2009). When Do Legislators Pass on Pork? The Role of Political Parties in Determining Legislator Effort. American Political Science Review. 103(01), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090054
Kerevel, Y. P. (2015). Pork-Barreling without Reelection? Evidence from the Mexican Congress: Mexican Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 40(1), 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12068
Kessler, D., & Krehbiel, K. (1996). Dynamics of Cosponsorship. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 555-566. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082608
Khwaja, A. I. (2009). Can good projects succeed in bad communities? Journal of Public Economics. 93(7-8), 899-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.02.010
King, G. (1990). Electoral Responsiveness and Partisan Bias in Multiparty Democracies. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 15(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.2307/440124
Lancaster, T. D. (1986). Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics. International Political Science Review.7(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218600700107
Langston, J. (2010). Governors and “Their” Deputies: New Legislative Principals in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298010791170132
Lijphart, A., & Aitkin, D. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford University Press.
Lizzeri, A., & Persico, N. (2001). The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives. The American Economic Review. 91(1), 225-239.
Lledo, V. (2003). Electoral Systems, Legislative Fragmentation and Public Spending: A Comparative Analysis of Brazilian States.
Lledo, V. (2002). “Electoral Systems, Legislative Fragmentation and Public Spending: A Comparative Analysis of Brazilian States.” Job Market Paper. Department of Economics, Wisconsin University.
Luna, J. P. (2007). Representación política en América Latina: El estado de la cuestión y una propuesta de agenda. Política y gobierno. 391-435.
Magaloni, B., Díaz-Cayeros, A., & Ruiz Euler, A. (2019). Public Good Provision and Traditional Governance in Indigenous Communities in Oaxaca, Mexico. Comparative Political Studies. 52(12), 1841-1880.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019857094
Micozzi, Juan Pablo. 2009. “The Electoral Connection in Multi-Level Systems with Non-Static Ambition: Linking Political Careers and Legislative Performance in Argentina”. Tesis para optar por el grado de Doctor en Filosofía, Rice University.
Meserve, S., Robbins, J., & Thames, F. (2017). Multiple Principals and Legislative Cohesion: Multiple Principals and Legislative Cohesion. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 42(4), 515-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12165
Mikel Barreda Díaz, & Ruiz Rodríguez, L. M. (2017). Modos de representación en los distritos: ¿diputados al servicio de los partidos o de los electores? Los casos de Chile y Bolivia. Perfiles latinoamericanos. 25(50), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2550-008-2017
Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R., & Rostagno, M. (2002). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 117(2), 609-657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753650346
Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency Influence in Congress. The American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952717
Monsiváis Carrillo, A. (2017). La desafección representativa en América Latina. Andamios. 14(35), 17-41.
Norris, P. (1997). Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems. International Political Science Review. 18(3), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251297018003005
Oakland, W. H. (1987). Chapter 9 Theory of public goods. En Handbook of Public Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 485-535). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(87)80004-6
Pitkin, H. (1985). El concepto de representación. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. Ponce, A. F., Lira, H. D., Ponce, A. F., & Lira, H. D. (2018). La política del gasto público estatal en México:
El rol de la fragmentación legislativa y del gobierno dividido. Revista SAAP. 12(2), 21-30.
Ponce, A. F., & Velázquez López Velarde, R. (2019). Understanding the political goals of non-binding resolutions: Evidence from the Mexican Chamber of Deputies. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 25(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1603207
Ponce-Rodríguez, R. A., Hankla, C. R., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Heredia-Ortiz, E. (2018). Rethinking the Political Economy of Decentralization: How Elections and Parties Shape the Provision of Local Public
Goods. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 48(4), 523-558. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy003
Powell, G. B. (2004). The Chain of Responsiveness. Journal of Democracy. 15(4), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0070
Rahat, G., & Hazan, R. Y. (2001). Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework. Party Politics. 7(3), 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003003
Ramseyer, J. (1995). Public Choice. Law & Economics Working Papers. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/394
Richardson Jr, L. E., & Freeman, P. K. (1995). Gender differences in constituency service among state legislators. Political Research Quarterly. 48(1), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129950480011
Robbins, J. W. (2010). Party System Institutionalization and Government Spending. Comparative Politics. 42(2), 229-248.
Rosas, G., Johnston, N. P., & Hawkins, K. (2014). Local public goods as vote-purchasing devices? Persuasion and mobilization in the choice of clientelist payments. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 26(4), 573-598.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629813511549
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 36(4), 387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895
Shomer, Y. (2017). The Conditional Effect of Electoral Systems and Intraparty Candidate Selection Processes on Parties’ Behavior: Electoral Systems and Selection Processes. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 42(1), 63-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12141
Shugart, M. S. (1999). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and the Provision of Collective Goods in Less-Developed Countries. Constitutional Political Economy. 10(1), 53-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009050515209
Siavelis, P., & Morgenstern, S. (Eds.). (2008). Pathways to power: Political recruitment and candidate selection in Latin America. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Soto Zazueta, I. M. (2016). El efecto de la competencia política sobre la provisión de bienes públicos locales en México. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago). 36(3), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2016000300007
Stratmann, T., & Baur, M. (2002). Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science. 46(3), 506. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088395
Taylor, M. M. (1992). Formal versus Informal Incentive Structures and Legislator Behavior: Evidence from Costa Rica. The Journal of Politics. 54(4), 1055-1073. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132108
Thomsen, D. M., & Sanders, B. K. (2018). Gender and Representation: A Tradeoff Between Constituency Service and Policy?. Working paper. Available at: https://genderstudies.nd.edu/assets/253419/gender_and_representation_abstract. pdf.
Thomas, S. (1992). The effects of race and gender on constituency service. Western Political Quarterly. 45(1), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500112
Ting, M. M., Snyder, J. M., & Hirano, S. (2018). Primary Elections and the Provision of Public Goods. The Journal of Politics. 80(2), 647-661. https://doi.org/10.1086/694788
Trasberg, M. E. (2021). Informal Customary Institutions, Collective Action, and Submunicipal Public Goods Provision in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society. 63(3), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2021.26
Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K. A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics. Journal of Political Economy. 89(4), 642-664. https://doi.org/10.1086/260997
Wessel Tromborg, M., & Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2019). Constituent Demand and District-Focused Legislative Representation: Constituent Demand and Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 44(1), 35-64.
https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12217
Zhang, X., Fan, S., Zhang, L., & Huang, J. (2004). Local governance and public goods provision in rural China. Journal of Public Economics. 88(12), 2857-2871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.004
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.