Orthodontic Treatment of a Class I Patient Using Self-Ligating System
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Teeth malocclusion is a disability with a potential impact on mental and physical health. Regarding the etiology, it is commonly caused by a distortion of normal development. Objective: To present the orthodontic management of a class I patient with a passive self-ligation system. Case presentation: 11-year-old female patient, mesofacial, straight profile, skeletal class I, molar class I, canine class not established, 6.4 mm upper crowding and 7.73 mm lower crowding, 5 mm overbite, and 2 mm overjet. Oral breather and onychophagia. Treatment was performed with passive self-ligating system brackets. In the alignment and leveling phase, Damon® Q brackets were placed in the upper and lower arch and 0.014" CuNiTi arches, class II elastics with 24 hours of use were indicated. Buildups were placed in the upper first molars. The work phase was started with a 0.016 x 0.022" SS lower arch and was finalized with 0.019 x 0.025" SS arches. Finally, appliance removal and retention placement were performed. As for results, the facial profile was maintained, crowding was eliminated, correct overjet and overbite were obtained, molar class I was obtained, and canine and anterior guidance were established. The curve of Spee was eliminated, and arches were coordinated, obtaining the patient's complete satisfaction. Conclusion: Decision-making in the treatment plan for patients with class I malocclusion must consider various characteristics, such as the patient's profile, incisor inclination, and lower facial height. In the present case, all the characteristics presented were adequate to perform a treatment without extractions which was confirmed by the results obtained.
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Graber LW, Vandarsall RL, Vig KW, Huang GJ. Ortodoncia, principios y técnicas actuales. 6 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier, 2017.
Kiyak HA. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' quality of life? J Dent Educ. 2008; 72(8): 886-894. PMID: 18676797
Angle, EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos. 1899; 41(18): 248-264. Cited in: Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23(6): 40.e1-e10. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Ortodoncia contemporánea. 5 ed. Barcelona: Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier, 2013.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Ortodoncia contemporánea. 6 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier, 2019.
Melgaço CA, Araújo MTS. Asymmetric extractions in orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012; 17(2): 151-156. DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512012000200025
Murphy CC, Magness WB, English JD, Frazier-Bowers SA, Salas AM. A longitudinal study of incremental expansion using a mandibular lip bumper. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(4): 396-400. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0396:ALSOIE>2.0.CO;2
Longlax-Triana MC, Jaimes Monroy G, Boada-Cuesta NJ, Lugo-Latorre AM. Efectividad de la expansión maxilar en la corrección de apiñamiento en dentición mixta. Revisión sistemática. Int J Odontostomat. 2020; 14(1): 101-106. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-381X2020000100101
Birnie D. The Damon passive self-ligating appliance system. Semin Orthod. 2008; 14(1): 19-35. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2007.12.003
Meeran NA. Self-ligating brackets: an update. J Clin Orthod. 2012; 46(4): 235-241. PMID: 22785015
Claudino D, Traebert J. Malocclusion, dental aesthetic self-perception and quality of life in a 18 to 21 year-old population: a cross section study. BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13: 3. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-3
Freitas BV, Rodrigues VP, Rodrigues MF, de Melo HVF, Dos Santos PCF. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with or without tooth extractions in Class I malocclusion patients : A comparative study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019; 9(2): 172-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.07.003
Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Factors affecting treatment decisions for Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 154(2): 234-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.035
Nam HJ, Flores-Mir C, Major PW, Heo G, Kim J, Lagravère MO. Dental and skeletal changes associated with the Damon system philosophical approach. Int Orthod. 2019; 17(4): 621-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.001
Lineberger MB, Franchi L, Cevidanes LHS, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, McNamara JA. Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38(6): 609-614. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv089
Herzog C, Konstantonis D, Konstantoni N, Eliades T. Arch-width changes in extraction vs nonextraction treatments in matched Class I borderline malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151(4): 735-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.021
Shook C, Kim SM, Burnheimer J. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with Damon and conventional brackets : A retrospective analysis. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86(4): 655-660. DOI: 10.2319/050515-304.1