THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION: A CONSIDERATION OF SOME EXISTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Contenido principal del artículo

Jesus Felipe
John McCombie
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8981-0131

Resumen

ABSTRACT


The concept of the aggregate production function, together with it supposedly being a test of the neoclassical marginal product theory of distribution, is now central to much of neoclassical macroeconomic theory. Severe criticisms of this concept that include the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies and the aggregation problem are now simply ignored. The reason is that estimates of the Cobb-Douglas and the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production functions, inter alia, give good statistical fits with the estimated output elasticities being often close to their factor shares. However, the reason for this is that in both cases all that is being estimated is merely the mathematical transformation of an accounting identity. As such, it has no economic implications and, in particular, says nothing about “the laws of production”. This analysis considers this criticism of the aggregate production function. In particular, it revisits and extends the criticisms made of Solow’s (1957) model of technical change and the use of the aggregate production function. It is shown that Solow’s (1974; 1987) defence of the aggregate production function is not convincing. The CES production function is also shown to be simply a transformation of the accounting identity and, consequently, also has no economic implications.


 


LA FUNCIÓN DE PRODUCCIÓN AGREGADA: UNA CONSIDERACIÓN DE ALGUNOS PROBLEMAS EXISTENCIALES


RESUMEN


El concepto de la función de producción agregada, junto con el supuesto de que se trata de una prueba de la teoría de la distribución del producto marginal neoclásica, ahora es fundamental para gran parte de la teoría macroeconómica neoclásica. Las severas críticas a este concepto, que incluyen las controversias de la teoría del capital de Cambridge y el problema de agregación, hoy día simplemente son ignoradas. La razón es que las estimaciones de las funciones de producción Cobb-Douglas y la elasticidad constante de sustitución (ECS), inter alia, dan buenos resultados estadísticos en los que las elasticidades producto estimadas con frecuencia se aproximan a las participaciones de los factores. Sin embargo, la razón de esto es que en ambos casos todo lo que se está estimando es meramente la transformación matemática de una identidad contable. En tal sentido, no tiene ninguna implicación económica y, en particular, no dice nada acerca de “las leyes de la producción”. El presente análisis considera esta crítica de la función de producción agregada. En particular, revisa de nuevo y extiende las críticas hechas al modelo de Solow (1957) del cambio técnico y el uso de la función de producción. Se demuestra que la defensa de Solow (1974; 1987) de la función de producción agregada no es convincente. Se demuestra también que la función de producción ECS es una simple transformación de la identidad contable y, en consecuencia, no tiene ninguna implicación económica.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Felipe, J., & McCombie, J. (2025). THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION: A CONSIDERATION OF SOME EXISTENTIAL PROBLEMS. Investigación Económica, 84(333), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2025.333.91816

Citas en Dimensions Service

Citas

Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.H., and Solow, R.M. (1961). Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. Review of Economics and Statistics, 243(3), 225-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1927286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1927286

Atkinson, A.B. (2005). The Atkinson Review: Final Report. Measurement of Government Output and Productivity for the National Accounts. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Birner, J. (2002). Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory. A Methodological Analysis. London and New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203416686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416686

Blaug, M. (1974). The Cambridge Revolution, Success or Failure? A Critical Analysis of Cambridge Theories of Value and Distribution. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

Bronfenbrenner, M. (1944). Production Functions: Cobb-Douglas, Interfirm, Intrafirm. Econometrica, 12(1), 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1905566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1905566

Cobb, C.W., and Douglas, P.H. (1928). A Theory of Production. American Economic Review (Supplement), 18(1), 139-165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811556

Cohen, A.J., and Harcourt, G.C. (2003). Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 199-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/089533003321165010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321165010

Corrado, C., Haskel, J., Jona-Lasinio, C., and Iommi, M., (2022). Intangible Capital and Modern Economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(3), 3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.3.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.3.3

Coutts, K., and Norman, N. (2013). Post-Keynesian Approaches to Industrial Pricing. A Survey and Critique. In: G.C. Harcourt and P. Kriesler (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390766.013.0019

Day, E.E, and Persons, W.M. (1920). An Index of the Physical Volume of Production III. Manufacture, 1899-1919. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2(11), 309-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1928576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1928576

Denison, E.F. (1967). Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experience in Nine Western Countries. (With the assistance of Jean-Pierre Poulliet). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Douglas, P.H. (1976). The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values. Journal of Political Economy, 84(5), 903-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260489

Falkus, M. (1996). Henry Phelps Brown as Economic Historian. Review of Political Economy, 8(2), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259600000050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259600000050

Felipe, J., and Fisher, F.M. (2003). Aggregation in Production Functions, What Applied Economists Should Know. Metroeconomica, 54(2‐3), 208-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-999X.00166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-999X.00166

Felipe, J., and Fisher, F.M. (2006). Aggregate Production Functions, Neoclassical Growth Models and the Aggregation Problem. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 24(1), 27-16.

Felipe, J., and Fisher, F.M. (2008). Aggregation (Production). In: S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2552-1

Felipe, J., and McCombie, J.S.L. (2001). The CES Production Function, the Accounting Identity, and Occam’s Razor. Applied Economics, 33(10), 1221-1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840122836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840122836

Felipe, J., and McCombie, J.S.L. (2006). The Tyranny of the Identity, Growth Accounting Revisited. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(3), 283-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02692170600735963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170600735963

Felipe, J., and McCombie, J.S.L (2011). On Herbert Simon’s Criticisms of the Cobb-Douglas and the CES Production Functions. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477340205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477340205

Felipe, J., and McCombie, J.S.L. (2013). The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change: ‘Not Even Wrong’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781782549680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782549680.00006

Felipe, J., McCombie, J.S.L, and Mehta, A. (2024). The Estimation of Production Functions with Monetary Values [Working Paper no. 1036]. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4687937

Ferguson, C.E. (1969). The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution. 2nd edition (reprinted with corrections, 1971). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896255

Ferguson, C.E. (1971). Capital Theory up to Date: A Comment on Mrs Robinson’s Article.The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 4(2), 250-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/133530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/133530

Fisher, F.M. (1969). The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions. Econometrica, 37(4), 553-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1910434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910434

Fisher, F.M. (1971). Aggregate Production Functions and the Explanation of Wages: A Simulation Experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 53(4), 305-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1928732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1928732

Fisher, F.M. (1992). Aggregation. Aggregate Production Functions and Related Topics. (J. Monz, ed.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Fisher, F.M. (2005). Aggregate Production Functions – A Pervasive, but Unpersuasive, Fairytale. Eastern Economic Journal, 31(3), 489-491. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40326426

Friedman, M. (1953). The Methodology of Positive Economics. In: M. Friedman (ed.), Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.010

Haldane, A., Brennan, S., and Maduros, V. (2010). What is the Contribution of the Financial Sector: Miracle or Mirage? In: A. Turner (ed.), The Future of Finance. The LSE Report. London: LSE.

Hall, R., and Hitch, C. (1939). Price Theory and Business Behaviour. Oxford Economic Papers, 2(1), 12-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxepap/os-2.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxepap/os-2.1.12

Haskel, J., and Westlake, S. (2017). Capitalism without Capital. The Rise of the Intangible Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77hhj DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77hhj

Hogan, W.P. (1958). Technical Progress and Production Functions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 40(4), 407-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1926345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926345

McCombie, J.S.L (1998). “Are there Laws of Production?”: An Assessment of the Early Criticisms of the Cobb-Douglas Function. Review of Political Economy, 10(2), 146-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259800000023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259800000023

McCombie, J.S.L. ( 2001). What does the Aggregate Production Show? Further thoughts on Solow’s “Second Thoughts on Growth Theory”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23(4), 589-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2001.11490301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2001.11490301

McCombie, J.S.L. (2011). “Cantabrigian Economics” and the Aggregate Production Function. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 8(1), 165-182. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2011.01.12

McCombie, J.S.L., and Dixon, R. (1991). Estimating Technical Change in Aggregate Production Functions: A Critique. International Review of Applied Economics, 5(1), 24-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/758524204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/758524204

Mankiw, N.G., and Taylor, J.P. (2008). Macroeconomics. European Edition. New York: Worth Publishers.

Marschak, J., and Andrews, W. (1944). Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production. Econometrica, 12(3/4), 143-120 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1905432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1905432

Moseley, F. (2015). The Marginal Productivity Theory of Capital in Intermediate Microeconomic Textbooks: A Critique. Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(2), 292-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0486613414557919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613414557919

Phelps Brown, E.H. (1957). The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(4), 546-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1885710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885710

Phelps Brown, E.H. (1996). Autobiographical Notes. Review of Political Economy, 8(2), 129-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259600000045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259600000045

Reder, M.W. (1943). An Alternative Interpretation of the Cobb-Douglas Function. Econometrica, 11(3 /4), 259-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1905678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1905678

Riach, P.A. (2019). Henry Phelps Brown (1906-1994). In: R.A. Cord (ed.), The Palgrave Companion to LSE Economics (p. 463-485). London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58274-4_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58274-4_18

Robinson, J.V. (1953-4). The Production Function and the Theory of Capital. Review of Economic Studies, 21(2), 81-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590550-3.50012-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296002

Robinson, J.V. (1970). Capital Theory Up to Date. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 3(2), 309-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/133680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/133680

Robinson, J.V. (1975). The Unimportance of Reswitching. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89(1), 32-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1881707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1881707

Routh, G. (2008). Phelps Brown, (Ernest), Henry, (1906-1994). In: S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1298-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1298-2

Samuelson, P.A. (1979). Paul Douglas’s Measurement of Production Functions and Marginal Productivities. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 923-939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260806

Shaikh, A. (1974). Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(1), 115-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1927538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1927538

Shaikh, A. (1980). Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II. In: E.J. Nell (ed.), Growth, Profits and Property: Essays in the Revival of Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571787.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571787.007

Simon, H.A. (1979a). Rational Decision-Making in Business Organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1808698

Simon, H.A. (1979b). On Parsimonious Explanations of Production Relations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81(4), 459-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3439661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3439661

Simon, H.A., and Levy, F.K. (1963). A Note on the Cobb-Douglas Function. Review of Economic Studies, 30(2), 93-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2295806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2295806

Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1926047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047

Solow, R.M. (1958). Technical Progress and Production Functions: Reply. Review of Economics and Statistics, 40(4), 411-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1926346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926346

Solow, R.M. (1974). Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra. The Humbug Production Function: A Comment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(1), 121. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1927539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1927539

Solow, R.M. (1987). Second Thoughts on Growth Theory. In: A. Steinherr and D. Weiserbs (eds.), Employment and Growth: Issues for the 1980s. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics. Vol. 16. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3605-8_2

Solow, R.M. (1988). Growth Theory and After. American Economic Review, 78(3), 307-317. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809135

Walters, A.A. (1963). Production and Cost Functions: An Econometric Survey. Econometrica, 31(1/2), 1-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1910949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910949

Wibe, S. (1984). Engineering Production Functions. A Survey. Economica, 51(204), 401-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2554225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2554225

Wicksell, K. (1896). Eim neues Prinzip der gerechen Besteurung. Finanz-theoretische Untersuchungenm. Translated as: A New Principle of Just Taxation. In: R.A. Musgrave and A.T. Peacock (eds.), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan, 1958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23426-4_6

Wilson, T., and Andrews, P.W.S. (1951). Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Whiteman, J.L. (1988). The Efficiency of Labour and Capital in Australian Manufacturing. Applied Economics, 20(2), 243-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036848800000008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848800000008